Akin Alert, 16/7/2011

Dear Spike,

Another week in Washington has been dominated by the debate on raising the federal debt ceiling. I believe that continuing on our current fiscal path is unsustainable and irresponsible. We will not fix our debt crisis overnight, but we must change course now rather than simply kicking the can further down the road.

Let me put our current debt situation in perspective. It took our nation 216 years and 41 presidents to accumulate our first $3.7 trillion in debt. It took President Obama less than two and a half years to accumulate the same amount of debt. Our total federal debt is now at $14.3 trillion, which is equal to roughly $46,000 in debt for every man, woman and child in the United States. This year, the federal government is borrowing about 40 cents of every single dollar it spends. This is simply unsustainable.

Next week, the House of Representatives will take a step toward fixing the structural problems that have led to this run away debt by voting on the Cut, Cap and Balance Act. This bill cuts $111 billion in federal spending in fiscal year 2012. The bill caps federal spending at 19.9% of GDP, the historical average level of federal spending since World War II. Lastly, the bill requires that a Constitutional amendment requiring a balanced budget be passed by Congress and sent to the states for ratification before any increase in the debt ceiling goes into effect. This bill is not perfect, and does not accomplish everything that must be done to rein in federal spending, but I believe it is a reasonable first step that would be a significant change in course. I look forward to supporting the Cut, Cap and Balance Act next week in the House.

Also this week, I participated in a House Budget Committee hearing on the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB) which was created by President Obama’s health care bill. The IPAB is comprised of fifteen un-elected bureaucrats who will be able to cut Medicare without the support or approval of Congress. IPAB is just another example of what is wrong with Obama’s healthcare bill–instead of empowering individuals to make choices about their own healthcare, it gives that power to un-elected bureaucrats. For this and many more reasons, we should repeal President Obama’s healthcare bill and replace it with something that is patient-centric and encourages the free market to work.

Lastly, this week I led a letter from most of the Missouri delegation calling for hearings on how the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has managed or potentially mis-managed the Missouri River. The Missouri River is an important resource for our state and our country, and it should be managed with a focus on flood-control and transportation. You can read my letter here. I also spoke on the House floor in support of an amendment that would prohibit funds from going to the Missouri River Authorized Purposes Study (MRAPS). A 17 year, $35 million study on this same issue was just completed. It makes no sense to do the same study over again at the cost of another $25 million. This is simply unacceptable.

It is an honor to serve you in Washington. Please do not hesitate to contact me via email, Facebook or Twitter, and please consider sharing this email with others who may be interested.


W. Todd Akin

You can contact the congressman HERE;www.akin.house.gov

One Response to “Akin Alert, 16/7/2011”

  1. AuditTheFed Says:

    Go to the Library of Congress website, thomas.loc, and read Sen. Mike Lee’s (R-UT) Cut, Cap, and Balance Bill, S. 1340. You can do this right on the home page, by searching under “S. 1340” for “Bill Number”. Also search S.J.R. 10, Orrin Hatch’s Balanced Budget Amendment (BBA). As of this morning, these bills have 32 and 47 (all) Republican Senators as cosponsors, and Thursday, Sen. Mitch McConnell cosponsored S. 1340!

    I crunched the numbers on S. 1340. It cuts spending immediately by $140 billion (?discrepancy with Rep. Akin’s letter–whatever), and caps the INCREASE in spending on non-defense discretionary, defense discretionary to 5% and 21% over 10 years, respectively; it caps the INCREASE in spending on mandatory Social Security, Medicare, Veteran’s Benefits to 66%, 76%, and 24% over 10 years. By my reading there is no limit/increase specified in the “Net Interest, Function 900” spending, which I guess makes sense if the interest rate cannot be foreseen.

    The final component of this bill is a BBA, like or similar to S.J.R. 10, which limits total outlays to prior fiscal year’s total receipts, limits spending to a % of GDP (Hatch’s bill specifies 18%), requires tax increases to pass by a super majority of both houses, and releases $2.41 TRILLION in extra borrowing authority (increase of the debt ceiling) once 2/3 of both House and Senate pass such an amendment and it is forwarded to the state legislatures (where 3/4 must approve).

    My local group of patriots will likely be gathering signatures on a letter to both federal and state legislative delegations, letting them know that we want the BBA and will work very energetically at the state level to see that our General Assembly passes it. This might be an approach others would like to adopt.

    I would be interested in hearing others’ ideas on these bills.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: